Reviewer workflow

Review recordings on your schedule. Score every candidate consistently.

When a student submits their interview it lands in your reviewer queue — with the recording, the questions they were asked, and structured fields for scores, notes, flags, and a recommendation.

Reviewer view

Min-jun Lee

Business · Intake 1

In review

8.4

Score

Recommend

0

Flags

Reviewer notes

Clear course motivation, articulate, no concerns about intent.

Submit recommendation
Flag

Three reviewer roles

Right access for the right person.

Admin

Full access — manages users, settings, billing, and can see all interviews and reviews across the workspace.

Admissions

Manages the interview workflow — creates questions, sends links, monitors queue status, generates reports, and exports results.

Reviewer

Watches recordings and submits structured assessments — scores, notes, flags, and recommendations. Sees only what's assigned to them.

What reviewers can do

Structured assessment — not a blank notes field.

Watch recordings

Play back the student's recorded responses alongside the questions they were asked — in the same view, no switching between tabs.

Score against criteria

Score each dimension your admissions team cares about — course fit, motivation, communication, background — whatever criteria you configure.

Notes and narrative

Free-text fields for reviewer notes, strengths, concerns, and overall assessment. Attached to the record, not in an email.

Flags

Flag interviews that need a second look, escalation, or further information before a recommendation can be made.

Recommendation

Recommend / Recommend with conditions / Do not recommend — controlled vocabulary so results can be compared and exported consistently.

Multiple attempts

If a student submitted multiple recording attempts, reviewers see each one and can choose which to assess.

Explore more

See it in action.

Start free — set up your first interview in minutes.